CSP Inferno Update [August 17]

[cashed]

Hey Everyone,

Progress has been going well with inferno as of late. More detail has been added without FPS hits, and I'm happy to say it's almost ready for public release. Feedback is always welcome, so post your thoughts/opinions about the map images in this thread.

Thanks,
Ted

http://cspromod.com/images/media/thumbnails/csp_preview_inf_001.png (http://cspromod.com/images/media/screenshots/csp_inf_001.jpg) http://cspromod.com/images/media/thumbnails/csp_preview_inf_002.png (http://cspromod.com/images/media/screenshots/csp_inf_002.jpg) http://cspromod.com/images/media/thumbnails/csp_preview_inf_003.png (http://cspromod.com/images/media/screenshots/csp_inf_003.jpg) http://cspromod.com/images/media/thumbnails/csp_preview_inf_004.png (http://cspromod.com/images/media/screenshots/csp_inf_004.jpg) http://cspromod.com/images/media/thumbnails/csp_preview_inf_005.png (http://cspromod.com/images/media/screenshots/csp_inf_005.jpg) http://cspromod.com/images/media/thumbnails/csp_preview_inf_006.png (http://cspromod.com/images/media/screenshots/csp_inf_006.jpg) http://cspromod.com/images/media/thumbnails/csp_preview_inf_007.png (http://cspromod.com/images/media/screenshots/csp_inf_007.jpg)

[stRR]

niceeeeeez =D

[onek]

Very very nice cashed, public hits coming up ;) I realy can't wait! Things are starting to look a hell of a lot up lately for CSP. Oh cashed the smilies has every type of emotion but a love one, this sucks personally.

p.s I wanted to send you love.

[stRR]

windows in banana still look weird tho :/
Also, in the Alt_mid, the string with clothes on is pretty useless (along with the door in B bombspot, but that is still ok), and the sand pit in A bombspot looks more like straw to me oO:(
would be nice to see it a little brighter like the original 1.6 inferno?

[ZeroKiller]

Dude that is one sexy map. But I can't click the last picture.

[cashed]

sorry it didn't upload *fixed*

[esk]

it looks awesome and im looking forward to playing on it :)
gj cashed ;)

[yuri]

aah very good to see more progress. details look amazingly :shock:
i cant wait :P

ps: how many hours did u spent making csp_inf /from initial ver to this final/ ?

oo shit nice job those maps are sick cant wait to see them in game

[krybi]

nice work that looks good ! but we need that update !

[xtobix]

man this looks almost perfect to me. nice brightness, nice fog/clouds, nice and well chosen textures..
also like that string with clothes.. i think it´s a small detail which doesn't affect gameplay.

mmh maybe remove that csp-logo at banana.. i think it´s enaugh to place one at the ct spawn.
csp-logo at banana doesn't really fit there.
also i don't like the ceiling-construction-texture which you can see at the wall on pic 6 (upper right corner). none of the other buildings has such a texture.. it looks a bit disturbing to me.
further you have not fixed the fence on pic 2.. near to the sand pit. you still have the little wall there.

really can´t wait to play with the new player-models and reorigined weapon-models on that map. i think it´ll feel like counter-strike 1.6:source x)
great work.
respect!

[messey]

you are the best cashed! :D

but plz if it takes longer to finish inferno, dont make it delay the release of b04 as a whole

[krash]

very nice :) reminds me of old ferno :)
--

on the side note, d2 needs work too. :)

great job .

[siz]

Gr8 job. It looks really nice. The only thing I can think of changing abit is the mountains/enviorment around it, the mountains just look so blurry, like it's zoomed in and like it was taking from 1.5...

[trekkster]

very good map indeed.

[ARi]

hm i think the "old" inferno looks like clearly ...

here the updated
http://emmediagroup.com/csp/pics/inf_b3/5.jpg
and the old one

http://emmediagroup.com/blog/wp-content ... banana.jpg (http://emmediagroup.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/csp_inferno_banana.jpg)


the last is my better i think... clear sight no damn fog that u cant see anyone little bit far away

edit: damn the picture are to big -.-

[brott]

Wow, that's awesome!

[stRR]

hm i think the "old" inferno looks like clearly ...

here the updated
http://emmediagroup.com/csp/pics/inf_b3/5.jpg
and the old one

http://emmediagroup.com/blog/wp-content ... banana.jpg (http://emmediagroup.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/csp_inferno_banana.jpg)


the last is my better i think... clear sight no damn fog that u cant see anyone little bit far away

edit: damn the picture are to big -.-

I have to agree with you, the seconf$d has that bright inferno look (: but it might be brightness/other graphical settings that are diffrent on the screeshot...

[Anonym]

gj, pls make mountains in background like Half-Life2: Episode Two (not 3D model)

sorry for my perfect english :lol: :lol: :lol:

http://ui13.gamespot.com/748/ep2outland12a0065_2.jpg
http://ui25.gamespot.com/1880/ep2outland12a0032_2.jpg

[j0lt]

Looks awesome.

[PutridBeing]

I do agree that the CSP logo on banana looks kind of out of place, but other than that it's perfect. I also had a simple idea for the windows at banana. Put some kind of mesh over the windows to make it look something like this.
http://img371.imageshack.us/img371/3849/stainlesssteeliv1.th.jpg (http://img371.imageshack.us/my.php?image=stainlesssteeliv1.jpg)
Though I must admit, I don't know how well that would fit the whole theme.

[Yatta]

/applaud

Thanks for the quality job, cashed. Keep it up!

[Venigo]

Awesome mapping Cashed, nice one!

Time for 1.04 and some wars :D, can't wait to play it :).

[badcoupon]

I'm sure they will make full use of a 3D skybox.

[tracetheace]

I'd have to say it looks amazing. I didn't spot too many problems. I liked how you faded the csp logo in ct spawn, very nice touch. But one thing caught my eye RIGHT away. It seemed as though pit went a little too far back(2).
http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/6768/pitjc8.th.jpg (http://img112.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pitjc8.jpg)

Another thing I noticed is that the fence with the pipes is gone and has been replaced with a house and a brick wall. All in all, it's very nice, but with one problem. The fence that used to be there was useful in a way because you could look through it to see if there was a player in the back corner of pit from jungle (ct spawn side mid).

Last thing i noticed, but it's probably nothing cause I haven't had a chance to play the map as of yet. It seems like you can't pass between the light post and the crate in circle #3. Cause that's one of my favorite spots to play in site A.

OH! and one other thing. When I'm playing ferno in 1.6. I get a sorta orange feeling throughout the entire map. This isn't a big deal or anything, just wondering if it would make the map feel more genuine...?

Besides that, map looks freaking great!
Keep it up :D

-EDIT-
Okay, so I was looking through some of the other pictures a little more closely. The light post in banana seems to be a little too tall. The light post in 1.6 seemed to be a little bit taller than 128 units. It was possible to boost up on top of it, which would gain you access to the side of the roof. Here's a video of a boost some kids did. they didn't do the boost the same way as I do with my team. It's at the 1:05 min mark.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RK-_bhCP ... re=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RK-_bhCPTUI&feature=related)

[z0nk]

Great work on de_inferno here!
But there are 2 things that have to be tweaked. I made some images to make it easier to understand.

First things are the pillars shown on the image. The small one on the left has to be removed an the pillars in middle have to be cutted more to the top direction (sry there are missing some words i like to use in my english :P). Hope the 1.6 screen will help to see what I mean.

http://www.plopp-media.de/_z0nk/csp/inf_pillars_small.jpg (http://www.plopp-media.de/_z0nk/csp/inf_pillars_big.jpg)
(Click IMG to enlarge)

Second thing is Roman R. Position (we call it like that in germany) marked on the picture. Will it still be reachable like in 1.6? (3 men needed).

http://www.plopp-media.de/_z0nk/csp/romanr_small.jpg (http://www.plopp-media.de/_z0nk/csp/romanr_big.jpg)
(Click IMG to enlarge)

[element13]

looks amazing.

[cashed]

the banana exploit will not be included mainly because its impractical. yes we all love it but it really isn't a crucial gameplay spot.

[yuri]

there are 2 things that have to be tweaked.
i think the left pillar is fine. do you remember 1.3 inf ? there was a crate instead ;)

http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/5854/deinferno0003wz1.th.jpg (http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=deinferno0003wz1.jpg)

[cem]

Well done cashed!
Im happy to see you working pretty hard with your part of the project!

[crawf]

I think its alot better, and im glad your reducing exploits and stuff, that way each league that hosts this game, won't have crappy rules that are different from the next. IE. one league says "You can't boost on that rock" and the next says "You can boost on that rock, but not on that wall next to it"

[Equanimity]

I am, to say the least, beyond impressed.

The only thing I could say I feel indifferent about is the logo on banana. I'd suggest putting that logo in T spawn (on the left wall, where there used to be three shuttered windows up high in 1.6).

Edit: z0nk and tracetheace have good points. Something to look into.

[TKI]

???????????, ?????? ???! ????? )))

[Venigo]

I am, to say the least, beyond impressed.

The only thing I could say I feel indifferent about is the logo on banana. I'd suggest putting that logo in T spawn (on the right wall, where there used to be three shuttered windows up high in 1.6).

Edit: z0nk and tracetheace have good points. Something to look into.

They have good point, but keep in mind this is a remake, not a COPY.

I would like to see the boxes from 1.3 in the map, it's giving some new spots :).

[z0nk]

if there will be the some crates like in 1.3 the it would be ok, cause it is a useful position then. but the small pillar seen on the screens can't be used as a secure position or maybe you forget that it is there an run righti n to it while running away from the enemy :D

I think it should be removed or improved to make it more useful :)

[fogster]

I really like this version except for these ugly green weeds on the rooftops in banana and alt-mid. From my point of view inferno should be a bright map but these weeds make it dark (bombsite b just looks PERFECT).

[Apoqramses]

bad for cs:s´ inf...every server would like to host csp_inferno instead of that sucking source-inferno :lol:

[xtobix]

bad for cs:s´ inf...every server would like to host csp_inferno instead of that sucking source-inferno :lol:

that's right^^

..
i think you really should add these:


Great work on de_inferno here!
But there are 2 things that have to be tweaked. I made some images to make it easier to understand.

First things are the pillars shown on the image. The small one on the left has to be removed an the pillars in middle have to be cutted more to the top direction (sry there are missing some words i like to use in my english :P). Hope the 1.6 screen will help to see what I mean.

http://www.plopp-media.de/_z0nk/csp/inf_pillars_small.jpg (http://www.plopp-media.de/_z0nk/csp/inf_pillars_big.jpg)
(Click IMG to enlarge)

Second thing is Roman R. Position (we call it like that in germany) marked on the picture. Will it still be reachable like in 1.6? (3 men needed).

http://www.plopp-media.de/_z0nk/csp/romanr_small.jpg (http://www.plopp-media.de/_z0nk/csp/romanr_big.jpg)
(Click IMG to enlarge)

and please remove these two textures.. i really don't like them (I marked them RED):
http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/2015/cspinf6uu7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/2015/cspinf6uu7.cb1b75fb9d.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=530&i=cspinf6uu7.jpg)

http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/3222/cspinf5vu3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/3222/cspinf5vu3.41a912c0aa.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=45&i=cspinf5vu3.jpg)

Further I think the doorframe of stone (marked BLUE) is too bright.. Maybe darken the texture..
(You corrected the trees, right? They look a lot better now!!!)

The brightness of the map overall is ok.. but it would be better to do a middle-thing between your earlyer version and this one. A little bit lighter than this version, but not too light. Leave HDR optional.

[cashed]

remember these pictures were taken with default brightness. you can jack up the gamma a good amount and it looks too bright. The left pillar is going to be clipped and is so small of a wall you wont even realize after playing the game alot

[j0lt]

remember these pictures were taken with default brightness. you can jack up the gamma a good amount and it looks too bright. The left pillar is going to be clipped and is so small of a wall you wont even realize after playing the game alot

:)

Those pillars in maps alway fuck me up when retreating :lol:

So good to hear!

[tracetheace]

and please remove these two textures.. i really don't like them (I marked them RED)
http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/3222/cspinf5vu3.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/3222/cspinf5vu3.41a912c0aa.jpg (http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=45&i=cspinf5vu3.jpg)

Why would cashed remove the csp logo in banana, its barely distracting at all, especially seeing as it has a faded and weathered look to it. It blends really well and should stay for sure.

It's not an add cause we all know we're playing csp. It's for the ppl that take the map and host it on a cs:s server. So that maybe those dummies will see the difference and check out csp.

[yuri]

The left pillar is going to be clipped and is so small of a wall you wont even realize after playing the game alot
+1

[xtobix]

@ tracetheace:

i think people will notice, that it´s a CSProMod-Map by reading the map-name and also by seeing the logo at ct-spawn.
there is no need to place the csp-logo everywhere in the map..
besides of that they should better place logos/advertisement etc. in some less eye-catching places of the map (ct-spawn, t-spawn.. or maybe even at a bombspot..).

[cashed]

they will probably be removed at some point in time. Its just there for now

[j0lt]

I think the CSP logo is a nice touch.

[tracetheace]

@ xtobix

Great rebuttal, I have no choice but to agree with you.
About the map though. My biggest concerns are mid with the pillars, would love to see them the same shape as 1.6 and also the "problem" with pit going too far back.

Other than that, textures don't really bother me, seeing as they don't actually affect core gameplay mechanics that much. Can't wait for your next update :D

[krash]

there are 2 things that have to be tweaked.
i think the left pillar is fine. do you remember 1.3 inf ? there was a crate instead ;)

http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/5854/deinferno0003wz1.th.jpg (http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=deinferno0003wz1.jpg)
fuck that makes me cry in a nerdy way. oldschool.

[Venigo]

there are 2 things that have to be tweaked.
i think the left pillar is fine. do you remember 1.3 inf ? there was a crate instead ;)

http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/5854/deinferno0003wz1.th.jpg (http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=deinferno0003wz1.jpg)
fuck that makes me cry in a nerdy way. oldschool.

So true, I hope to the some boxes instead of the pilar..

Spanish: Esta muy bien el mapa, buen trabajo xD.

English: Is very Good.

[VIDEN]

At bomb place B the trees outside was nice ;) .

[Absurd]

Looks great, keep up the good work. I hope 1.0.4 comes out soon!

[stRR]

i prefer the version before tho, brightness wise (:

[Coleman]

one word... sexyyyy :D

[zer0xp]

looks absolutely amazing :)

the windows at the top of banana do seem to look a little out of place though as someone mentioned earlier. other than that it looks very sexy

[Biohazard]

My thoughts: The layout looks exactly like 1.6(or almost), but..Meh, I don't get the whole 1.6 feeling.I don't know..Maybe the textures?Or maybe it is too dark?I don't really know.

Oh and IMO, I think you should take that door out in the banana.Don't transform it in a Source map..

[tripst]

the map looks fine as it is the door doesnt win games :D

[TempesT]

the door doesnt win games :D

+1

[Redstar]

Hey Cashed, the last time I talked to you, you were hesitating about the tank in spawn ct, did you finally decide to inclued it or not?

ps: AMAZING work :D

[Jagerinho]

why on earth would you have a tank in CT spawn??

[brott]

I think he means an APC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armoured_personnel_carrier) (Armoured Personnel Carrier). I think there was one of them in the CSS version of inferno.

[j0lt]

Map already looks Sourcey enough, I think CT Spawn looks great without the openness of adding an APC and invisible brushes and stuff.

[Redstar]

yeah, I know, it looks better without the tank in spawn CT, but in the csp_inferno video, you can see that the tank (or APC I don't know how it's called) is still in spawn ct, so I hope Cashed didn't include it for the final version of inferno :D

[j0lt]

I I thought you were suggesting it should be included ;)

My bad.

[cashed]

any suggestions?

[Equanimity]

any suggestions?

Release it. XD

[yuri]

cashed, my humble suggestion is to remove the blue door at banana.
when u do this your inf is done and ready to launch.
PS u can think again about 1.3-style crates from my older post :)

[j0lt]

any suggestions?

The only thing I see with the map that is not perfect are those funny arch window things on banana. The textures don't work with the rest of the wall. If you can somehow fix that it will be perfect ;)

[cashed]

ok that i dont get. it looks good ingame.

[j0lt]

ok that i dont get. it looks good ingame.

Well maybe it looks better ingame than it does in the screenshots ;) I won't doubt you. On the screenshots it just looks like the texture of the arches contrasts with the wall texture too much, but it's not even that bad really. Just the only thing I can think of that could be improved (even if just a little bit) :P

[Coleman]

ill give u some suggestions if u give me the map too test :D

[chizz]

take out blue door banana
remove clothes line alt middle
roof @ banana should be same as the whole map
arched windows banana should not be there or should be different
pit fence should be all fence no wall ( it also looks to long but it could just be the angle)
mid columns should be angled

other than those minor minor things which most have been mentioned, the map looks phenomenal.

keep up the amazing work cashed and the rest of the csp

[PutridBeing]

I know it's a really little thing but I personally wouldn't mind seeing this added again.
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/5721/deinfernoclassic0000sq2.th.jpg (http://img99.imageshack.us/my.php?image=deinfernoclassic0000sq2.jpg)

What do y'all think?

[Jagerinho]

Just noticed something

http://emmediagroup.com/csp/pics/inf_b3/2.jpg

The pit wall should go back to being a fence again. You could see people few it and it helped a lot when spotting to see if the enemy was coming over mini pit into site. Also an awper was able to scope from the wall oppisite arch and spot through the fence.

[j0lt]

Just noticed something

http://emmediagroup.com/csp/pics/inf_b3/2.jpg

The pit wall should go back to being a fence again. You could see people few it and it helped a lot when spotting to see if the enemy was coming over mini pit into site. Also an awper was able to scope from the wall oppisite arch and spot through the fence.

Yeah I agree with this, even though it is difficult sometimes it helps.

[cashed]

ya it helps but its not realistic. remember csp and the maps are not direct ports. once play testing has gotten through with the new inferno the option of changing things will emerge. right now its a mix of 1.6 and css. Css had a full wall, 1.6 had a fence that acted like a wall but you couldn't shoot though it.

[Jagerinho]

actually you could shoot through it with an awp

[bonyfjhaha]

Pretty NICE!!!

But i dont think it is suitable that some moutain appeaing around the map.

Maybe some other buildings in the same styles aroud is better?

[stRR]

Pretty NICE!!!

But i dont think it is suitable that some moutain appeaing around the map.

Maybe some other buildings in the same styles aroud is better?

who cares about that? Its the same in 1.6 anyway...

[kilroy]

take out blue door banana
remove clothes line alt middle
roof @ banana should be same as the whole map
arched windows banana should not be there or should be different
pit fence should be all fence no wall ( it also looks to long but it could just be the angle)
mid columns should be angled

other than those minor minor things which most have been mentioned, the map looks phenomenal.

keep up the amazing work cashed and the rest of the csp


fully agreee....word for word.
the map is sexy, especially both the bomb sites, gr8 job cashed, u rock ;)

[onek]

I think the map looks better than the 1.6 version, who cares if there is an arch, its just to make it look pretty, although its not going to effect game play, unless you enjoy getting sidetracked.... :!:

[Redstar]

although its not going to effect game play
I confirm, it doesn't effect game play at all ;)

[Spartan]

They look awesome. Very nice.

[[EA]]

Is it possible to stack near mid?

[cashed]

why not

[yuri]

I understand that next release is stil far far away /as always/, but why not to release updated inferno?
btw the "closed beta" ended or ???
btw #2 I dont understand the development schedule... in my opinion communitiy would really apriciate something like this: progress bar (http://www.imperialwinter.com/?sec=progress) xD

[daNKen]

Whats the exact date of the realise of beta1.04? :?: :?: :?: :?:
U were talking about january......

[smartin]

Whats the exact date of the realise of beta1.04? :?: :?: :?: :?:
U were talking about january......

Lol, why the f#%k would you expect them to have a set date for the release? It's out when it's out, probably this month or next.

[yuri]

"Whene its done!"
-Duke Nukem Forever

[daNKen]

An exact date would make things happen a littlebit faster.... don't U think?
In case of a deadline the members of the dev.team would work every day enought to be ready with the work.
But what's the situation now? They have no deadline, so they think they can work as long as they want, they probably don't spend enough time for the developement.
If we can talk about a deadline, than the developers know that the work has to be done in an interval.
:x

[smartin]

They have no deadline, so they think they can work as long as they want, they probably don't spend enough time for the developement.

Um, deadlines have been seen before. It's not like setting deadlines legally forces you to finish something; if they're not finished till the deadline, they'll just push it even forward. Broken promises are far more frustrating than a slow progress.

[KaNaR]

Whats the exact date of the realise of beta1.04? :?: :?: :?: :?:
U were talking about january......

Lol, why the f#%k would you expect them to have a set date for the release? It's out when it's out, probably this month or next.How long have we been saying it ?

A long time ago, I was even thinking they would release it while the old site was still "updated". I've lost faith in that mod, and in CS in general (but I will try B1.04 IF it's released).

Insurgency rocks

[xtobix]

Whats the exact date of the realise of beta1.04? :?: :?: :?: :?:
U were talking about january......

Lol, why the f#%k would you expect them to have a set date for the release? It's out when it's out, probably this month or next.How long have we been saying it ?

A long time ago, I was even thinking they would release it while the old site was still "updated". I've lost faith in that mod, and in CS in general (but I will try B1.04 IF it's released).

Insurgency rocks


I can only agree. Simply because all what he says is RIGHT.. :s
Promod is too slow in it's development.

[smartin]

I can only agree. Simply because all what he says is RIGHT.. :s
Promod is too slow in it's development.

Then leave, or find some coders that match the coder profile for this mod perfectly.

[adz]

it looks awesome also looking forward to play on it, gj cashed.

[KG427]

looking good. !!!

[yuri]

Its slow due lack of the coders. If there was an army of free C++ coders with game development exps, future cs interest AND no salary demands development would be fast and awesome.
U know this is the toughest part of every free mod :)

//highlited

[donlan]

I remember reading once on the forums that there's not a lack of coders working on the project becase they're hard to find, it's because it's hard to find the developers with the same love for CS and the interest in keeping esports in CS alive.

[RATpope]

just a little quick suggestion from bombsite a i believe it is you can go into a room with a window and snipe down alt mid in the source version you can jump into that room from alt mid and it was convenient plz add this also in a bombsite between the lamppost and the wall could you please ad a wooden fence just for a little protection for the ct team. my rant is done.

[yuri]

Maps are replicas of 1.6 ones => theres no way to the balcony from the alt-mid like its in CSS.

[madmax]

Maps are replicas of 1.6 ones => theres no way to the balcony from the alt-mid like its in CSS.
you can still boost i hope?

[swokor]

404 Not Found :cry:

[leffix]

404 Not Found :cry:
Same "/

[RATpope]

well that sux the alt mid jump was one of the selling points of the whole map for me

[madmax]

well that sux the alt mid jump was one of the selling points of the whole map for me
then you wust have to do like every body else does BOOST

[Chris]

404 Not Found :cry:
Same "/

The thing is a year old, just check the map preview vid should be enough right?

[haGisson]

also it's unplayable, so do your self a favor and dont get 1.03!

[gregggggg]

also it's unplayable, so do your self a favor and dont get 1.03!

qft

[leffix]

The thing is a year old, just check the map preview vid should be enough right?

Yea, it's just that I am new to the community, and didn't realize it was 17. october 2008, thought it was 2009, so i didn't really get it :lol:

[nGd01k]

nice !

[pRopaaNS]

My opinion:
http://imageshack.dk/imagesfree/rTf57590.jpg
Maybe those windows are acceptable, altought they don`t make sense, but that piece of garbage (what is it meant for at all? Is it meant for laundry drying or what?

[yogurt]

My opinion:
http://imageshack.dk/imagesfree/rTf57590.jpg
Maybe those windows are acceptable, altought they don`t make sense, but that piece of garbage (what is it meant for at all? Is it meant for laundry drying or what?

well, who gives a shit

[hxcguitarist]

My opinion:
http://imageshack.dk/imagesfree/rTf57590.jpg
Maybe those windows are acceptable, altought they don`t make sense, but that piece of garbage (what is it meant for at all? Is it meant for laundry drying or what?

It doesn't effect FPS, nor does it effect gameplay.

[pRopaaNS]

But that doesn`t make sense... . :) Those windows are a bit ilogical and that iron hook.. I don`t even know what it is, loL

[hxcguitarist]

:-/ I still don't see a reason to remove them. They add to the visual appearance without reducing FPS or effecting gameplay.

[pRopaaNS]

Do we want our csp maps to be the best or not? Even if it`s just a little thing, if that makes the map better, then it`s worth it.

[tiger]

There are doors on the BP therefore those windows are not illogical at all.

[element13]

Nothing wrong with windows. It's a building, buildings have windows.

As for the hook, who cares. Like someone else said, it just adds visual appearance.
It's supposed to be a flower pot holder thing, who cares if it's useless.

[dem3nted]

Maybe u want a blank wall with nothing?

[element13]

Or he could just close his eyes when he passes those corners! lol

[dem3nted]

ROFL xD

[lordxray]

My opinion:
http://imageshack.dk/imagesfree/rTf57590.jpg
Maybe those windows are acceptable, altought they don`t make sense, but that piece of garbage (what is it meant for at all? Is it meant for laundry drying or what?

The "POINTLESS CRAP" might by handy actually. i mean if you can stand on it...

[groov]

Why must some 1.6 players complain about some extra visual stimulation in the csp maps. this is the Source Engine afterall. The Dev's got it right make it run/play like 1.6, and make it look like Source minus the physics props that hinder movement.

Besides those windows could act as visuals for future wall bangs

[doublethink]

LOL.

NO WINDOWS EVER.

FUCK THE SUN.

I laught so hard I did throw my iPhone down the stairs..


... Not funny...

[haGisson]

iPhone sucks hard

[Vainglory]

I laught so hard I did throw my iPhone down the stairs..


... Not funny...
You didn't throw the iPhone down the stairs, it threw itself.

"fuck the sun" did it ;x i hate you "fuck the sun"

[pRopaaNS]

Agree, do you know how much cs players hate sun? It`s quite often in summer when sun shines through window to monitor, it`s so annoying... :D Stupid sun, don`t make me to nail down my window.... x}

[haGisson]

yeah, i always have to draw the curtains

[mattyeagle21]

A little extra of visuals arenot bad thing unless it stupid and in a way like source dust2 cans, cars and barrels and stupid shit like that or overwhelming like nuke visuals srry fuck my english

[DIEEIER]

Hello, sorry if this is asked before..

..are you planning on adding some of the colours of 1.6? seems now to have 1 color for all buildings while in 1.6 have multi colors very marked, like red and yellow and pink. All else is looking really good to me.

[10000]

Hello, sorry if this is asked before..

..are you planning on adding some of the colours of 1.6? seems now to have 1 color for all buildings while in 1.6 have multi colors very marked, like red and yellow and pink. All else is looking really good to me.


Yes i have this quiestion too, uniform grey have sort of prison level look.

[Bower]

GAYYYYYYYYYY

[[EA]]

I hope colors are implemented over. Makes it visually appealing. :-)

[DanLegenD]

Do we want our csp maps to be the best or not? Even if it`s just a little thing, if that makes the map better, then it`s worth it.

Its purely opinion saying that they would be better without windows. so why even spend time caring?

[vctm]

I hope colors are implemented over. Makes it visually appealing. :-)

Where can I download this grayscale version of the map?

[MrBaruth]

First of all, I think the map looks really really good. Very good work there !
Just one thing I like to be improved: the backround. It looks very bad in my opinion.


here some pics:

http://www.pictureupload.de/originals/pictures/200111150009_csp_inferno0000.jpg
http://www.pictureupload.de/originals/pictures/200111150044_csp_inferno0001.jpg

Its nothing important, but it helps to improve the visuals.

greets

[n3krO]

Actually i would prefer to have no background such as 1.6... make houses instead of gardens.....

[Improved]

First of all, I think the map looks really really good. Very good work there !
Just one thing I like to be improved: the backround. It looks very bad in my opinion.

here some pics:

http://www.pictureupload.de/originals/pictures/200111150009_csp_inferno0000.jpg
http://www.pictureupload.de/originals/pictures/200111150044_csp_inferno0001.jpg

Its nothing important, but it helps to improve the visuals.

greets

I mentioned this to cashed a year ago.

The background in csp_inferno looks really our of place, sort of like the gameworld aka playable are have being really nicely done in 3d and the background done if really poor 2d, if you get my drift. Sort of mixing crappy visuals like seen in Fifa games where the crowd looks really crappy and awful and the actual visual quality of the players is far superior.

The crappy background in csp_inferno doesnt mix well imho.

[n69ky]

I mentioned this to cashed a year ago, the background in csp_inferno looks really our of place, sort of the game world being really nicely done in 3d and the background done if really poor 2d, if you get my drift. Sort of mixing crappy visuals like seen in Fifa games where the crowd looks really awful and the actual visual quality on the players is far superior.

well, guys, first things first.

[Improved]

well, guys, first things first.

Crossing fingers my man because other than that, csp_inferno looks splendid and really makes you wanna play it :)