Source players in ProMod

[Trippy]

Why are source players better at promod than 1.6 players when they get smashed if they played 1.6 and the mouse feels like source it should feel like 1.6

[Lordearon]

hello! it's still the source engine... some things will always feel saucy...

btw, I read css players have a lot more to adjust too then 1.6, it's give-n-take both ways

[zachst]

hum dingarihtim uhghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr dingam dur dah dooooooooo durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.?


duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu r

[phreaK]

graphics have a lot to do with the feel of a game. keep in mind its easier to spray with lower gun origins (source origins), so maybe the source players are playing with those.

[russki]

Lol. I was having a hard time with the AK. It feels so much like 1.6 it's retarded. =/ Oh and BRING BACK CROSSHAIRSCALING IMMEDIATELY. I tried maxing out my res on my 1080p laptop, and the smallest crosshair is gargantuan. =/. Then again it's the leaked version, might be fixed in RC4.

[Chris]

The recoil in the leaked version was old recoil, there's gonna be better recoil when they release it, right? Oh and funny thing to notice, I was trying the leaked version and I asked what do you guys play, 1.6 or source. They all said source.

[VIDEN]

hum dingarihtim uhghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr dingam dur dah dooooooooo durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.?


duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu r
Why post?

[paradox]

The recoil in the leaked version was old recoil, there's gonna be better recoil when they release it, right? Oh and funny thing to notice, I was trying the leaked version and I asked what do you guys play, 1.6 or source. They all said source.

That's because it was leaked onto a predominately source scene website.

[Chris]

The recoil in the leaked version was old recoil, there's gonna be better recoil when they release it, right? Oh and funny thing to notice, I was trying the leaked version and I asked what do you guys play, 1.6 or source. They all said source.

That's because it was leaked onto a predominately source scene website.

Maybe :)

[phreaK]

the recoil in the leaked version feels exactly the same as 1.6.

[Lordearon]

I'm starting to think that it has Spunge's research in it, as it also has the viewbob/bobcycle... (which was posted about after Spunge joined the beta testing team) but alba _did_ mention that RC4 fixed the lagging behind of the cursor, which seems to be the reason some ppl have issues with the recoil.

[wtfpwnage]

I am a source player and to be completely frank. It does not feel like source. It does not feel like 1.6 either. It looks great but it drives like crap.....

[RATpope]

the only reason most source players suck at 1.6 is beacause of the shitty aiming and recoil after you get past that its all the same shit.

[hxcguitarist]

the only reason most source players suck at 1.6 is beacause of the shitty aiming and recoil after you get past that its all the same shit.

Not true. Source players can aim quite fine. What makes them bad is that the gameplay mechanics are completely different. In CSS, peakers have an advantage, but in 1.6, players holding angles have the advantage, and thus that is why a lot CSS players tend to do worse in 1.6 versus how 1.6 players do in Source.

[russki]

the only reason most source players suck at 1.6 is beacause of the shitty aiming and recoil after you get past that its all the same shit.

Not true. Source players can aim quite fine. What makes them bad is that the gameplay mechanics are completely different. In CSS, peakers have an advantage, but in 1.6, players holding angles have the advantage, and thus that is why a lot CSS players tend to do worse in 1.6 versus how 1.6 players do in Source.

No. The better player has the advantage, no matter if he's a peeker or a camper. I personally don't do as well in 1.6 because it feels to me as if I'm completely on the model of the player I'm shooting, but nothing is happening. That's mostly due to the difference in sensitivity, netcode, hitboxes and recoil. (yes, the hitboxes are better in source due to zblock.) If I was to play 1.6 for a month or two, I'd be just as good at it as I am at source.. but the bang isn't worth the buck, let's hope csp is.

edit; oh and 1.6 players are equally godawful at source as source players are at 1.6 for one simple reason - IT'S A DIFFERENT GAME. In a given amount of time any GOOD gamer can get good at any game, it's all a matter of talent.

[groov]

I play both games and tend to hover around 1580-1680 in ESEA skill in both games at the same time, but I also tend to not play ESEA too much as it forms bad habits unless playing with a scrim team or multiple friends who dont just bait.
The recoil in the leaked version is not like 1.6 nor is it like source. The M4 recoil is decent but the AK is horrendously overdone.
Feels like shooting a Machine Gun in COD without having it laid out.

The movement feels fine. and it is possible to bhop a few jumps but the timing must be perfect or you get severely penalized with a huge speed decrease. They even eachother out as you get quite fast very quick when done right.

The aiming feels similar to 1.6 in the leaked version once you turn off the source delayed weapon movement as that movement alone will throw you off visually. But it feels like its own game. Which is a good thing. In order for this to work it must be not only a new game but also be accepted by both communities. Oh and btw more 1.6 players came to source then you think. Most of 1.6 is 14-17yr old 8digits. The population of good source teams and good 1.6 teams are all low digits for the most part. The difference is 1.6 is full of young gamers who want to be like the pro's they have seen in videos hence their partial views toward 1.6.

[shumped]

the recoil in the leaked version feels exactly the same as 1.6.
no.


it feels awkward weird and very source-ish except for the AK that is just un-sprayable

[mikeh]

Having come from 1.6 to now playing source, I can honestly say that Promod feels like neither of them

[Fokz]

And I told it to the dev team a long time ago - It will never feel like 1.6 because it is not possible to achieve this on source engine without 1.6 code etc.

Thats why I also told them to make a hybrid of both games and mix them to get a new better gameplay but all you said is "make it 1.6 bla bla bla" and now you will see how "CSS1.6" feels ;d

The game would be quite good, but the nades are -_- just and nothing more.

[bryaNNN]

the only reason most source players suck at 1.6 is beacause of the shitty aiming and recoil after you get past that its all the same shit.

Not true. Source players can aim quite fine. What makes them bad is that the gameplay mechanics are completely different. In CSS, peakers have an advantage, but in 1.6, players holding angles have the advantage, and thus that is why a lot CSS players tend to do worse in 1.6 versus how 1.6 players do in Source.

No. The better player has the advantage, no matter if he's a peeker or a camper. I personally don't do as well in 1.6 because it feels to me as if I'm completely on the model of the player I'm shooting, but nothing is happening. That's mostly due to the difference in sensitivity, netcode, hitboxes and recoil. (yes, the hitboxes are better in source due to zblock.) If I was to play 1.6 for a month or two, I'd be just as good at it as I am at source.. but the bang isn't worth the buck, let's hope csp is.

edit; oh and 1.6 players are equally godawful at source as source players are at 1.6 for one simple reason - IT'S A DIFFERENT GAME. In a given amount of time any GOOD gamer can get good at any game, it's all a matter of talent.

actually hxcguitarist is right, i played 1.6 for 5 years, and everyone knows if you have the wall you your left and they come up u can see them first and in source when you come out you have like .100 seconds more time to see them before the camper sees you on thier screen i play source now, 1.6 got old after 5 years suprised it hasnt for most of you guys ;)

[russki]

I'm sorry but I can't acknowledge the relevance of you playing 1.6 for 5 years in this argument. I have played every version of CS, and have indeed played CSS since it's release. There hasn't been a peeker's advantage since they locked netcode commands with zblock. It's all down to reaction time and angle for both players, whether peeking or standing still. The peeker advantage in source is a myth, and will always remain a myth.

[rezOnance]

Im a source player and i think the leaked beta feels more like 1.6 than Source. Its mainly the weapon origins, view bob and bullet impact effects that do it for me.

[phreaK]

I'm sorry but I can't acknowledge the relevance of you playing 1.6 for 5 years in this argument. I have played every version of CS, and have indeed played CSS since it's release. There hasn't been a peeker's advantage since they locked netcode commands with zblock. It's all down to reaction time and angle for both players, whether peeking or standing still. The peeker advantage in source is a myth, and will always remain a myth.

there definitely is a peekers advantage still.

cl_interp 0.01

thats how you get killed when you are way around a corner and its also why if you die when moving that you see your body teleport 2 feet backwards in deathcam.

[phreaK]

the recoil in the leaked version feels exactly the same as 1.6.
no.


it feels awkward weird and very source-ish except for the AK that is just un-sprayable


it definitely doesnt feel sourceish. i have played source since its release. k?
i can switch back and forth from 1.6 to promod and notice no difference and spray just as well in either game. in the source engine to recoil just feels smoother.

[Brainkiller]

I'm sorry but I can't acknowledge the relevance of you playing 1.6 for 5 years in this argument. I have played every version of CS, and have indeed played CSS since it's release. There hasn't been a peeker's advantage since they locked netcode commands with zblock. It's all down to reaction time and angle for both players, whether peeking or standing still. The peeker advantage in source is a myth, and will always remain a myth.

there definitely is a peekers advantage still.

cl_interp 0.01

thats how you get killed when you are way around a corner and its also why if you die when moving that you see your body teleport 2 feet backwards in deathcam.
neither of those are to do with cl_interp but rather cl_interpolate 1

If you're getting killed when you're already behind cover it's because the guy who killed you has high ping and is therefore for eg. 200ms in the past, but to make the game fare it teleports you back 200ms and you get hit.

neither of those are to do with cl_interp but rather cl_interpolate 1

If you're getting killed when you're already behind cover it's because the guy who killed you has high ping and is therefore for eg. 200ms in the past, but to make the game fare it teleports you back 200ms and you get hit.

this!!

[phreaK]

no not that. there is peeker advantage is source and any who plays it knows there is. its the most complained about aspect of the game. thats how CSS on LAN and online differs.

and its definitely not because of high ping. in 1.6 if i get picked through the crack at mid, i die at the crack. if i get picked through the crack in source im already past the crack and into the right door. its common knowledge that there is peeker advantage in source and that there is a delay.

[Brainkiller]

no not that. there is peeker advantage is source and any who plays it knows there is. its the most complained about aspect of the game. thats how CSS on LAN and online differs.

and its definitely not because of high ping. in 1.6 if i get picked through the crack at mid, i die at the crack. if i get picked through the crack in source im already past the crack and into the right door. its common knowledge that there is peeker advantage in source and that there is a delay.
I know there is a peakers advantage, but your examples aren't proving peakers advantage they're examples of what occurs when a person with high ping kills a person with average ping.

[shumped]

And I told it to the dev team a long time ago - It will never feel like 1.6 because it is not possible to achieve this on source engine without 1.6 code etc.

Thats why I also told them to make a hybrid of both games and mix them to get a new better gameplay but all you said is "make it 1.6 bla bla bla" and now you will see how "CSS1.6" feels ;d

The game would be quite good, but the nades are -_- just and nothing more.
it's an old build, dumbass. they can recreate the 1.6 feel on the source engine just that it needs alot of tweaking.

[Forever0]

RUSSKI
There is a 110 MS delay between the peeker and the person posted up. Obviously Milliseconds is a very small unit but with cl_interpolate at 1 online it will force a 110 MS difference between like I said the person peeking and the person posted up. That means the person peeking has a slight advantage. IT ISNT much but if you are extremely good at jump peeking it gives you sooooooooooooo much of an advantage. Also if you hold a terrible angle this advantage will be noticed if you get peeked.

[shumped]

the recoil in the leaked version feels exactly the same as 1.6.
no.


it feels awkward weird and very source-ish except for the AK that is just un-sprayable


it definitely doesnt feel sourceish. i have played source since its release. k?
i can switch back and forth from 1.6 to promod and notice no difference and spray just as well in either game. in the source engine to recoil just feels smoother.
i played 1.5 halfway trough 1.6 until release of source where i played source and source only m'kay? for me the recoils of the mp5 and m4 are incredibly easy and feels very sourcey except for some movement changes. does not feel like 1.6 at all right now as the does not stay after you've shot like in 1.6.

[TheoRy]

Fyi to all the source players, this game is not going to have the terrible recoil of the dreaded source, they have made it clear the game is 1.6 with better graphics, only thing from source is the textures, skins, and sounds. not your bad recoil...

[TheoRy]

delete

[SirK]

stop calling it bad... its another game dont u get it? source never wanted to be 1.6 with better graphics like promod.
you can say "meh i dont like it" but not "its crappy and bad" its different, get over it^^

its like compare an awp to a quake railgun xD

[yogurt]

Oh sheesh terrible recoil eh? Bullshit said by dude who saw css in '05 with 11245645654 bugs.

Oh and 1.6 recoil feels easier to me.

[hxcguitarist]

Oh sheesh terrible recoil eh? Bullshit said by dude who saw css in '05 with 11245645654 bugs.

Oh and 1.6 recoil feels easier to me.

I <3 the 1.6 recoil, but whether it's easier or harder, I can't say. It would take time to get used to either.

[perfypoo]

the leaked version has a more 1.6 feel if I had to choose. I dont feel that there is a huge difference between the recoils, but source is definitely more random compared to 1.6...unless i have terrible luck. All the jumping headshots and running backward sprays gets a little old in source. Yes, it happens in 1.6, but I feel it happens much more often in source. The deagle is one example of the differences in recoil. Simply put, the source deagle is more accurate (thus easier to use) than the 1.6 deagle. However, I love getting those sexy 1 deags in source :).

[hxcguitarist]

the leaked version has a more 1.6 feel if I had to choose. I dont feel that there is a huge difference between the recoils, but source is definitely more random compared to 1.6...unless i have terrible luck. All the jumping headshots and running backward sprays gets a little old in source. Yes, it happens in 1.6, but I feel it happens much more often in source. The deagle is one example of the differences in recoil. Simply put, the source deagle is more accurate (thus easier to use) than the 1.6 deagle. However, I love getting those sexy 1 deags in source :).

The one deags in Source feel amazing! I'm not bashing on the one deags I've gotten in 1.6, but it just doesn't feel as good for some reason xD

[paradox]

one deags are easier in source imo, I'd say 80% of kills with the deagle are one-deags in competitive play

[hxcguitarist]

I'm not denying that the one deags are easier, but they just feel sexier in Source man.

[shumped]

the leaked version has a more 1.6 feel if I had to choose. I dont feel that there is a huge difference between the recoils, but source is definitely more random compared to 1.6...unless i have terrible luck. All the jumping headshots and running backward sprays gets a little old in source. Yes, it happens in 1.6, but I feel it happens much more often in source. The deagle is one example of the differences in recoil. Simply put, the source deagle is more accurate (thus easier to use) than the 1.6 deagle. However, I love getting those sexy 1 deags in source :).

The one deags in Source feel amazing! I'm not bashing on the one deags I've gotten in 1.6, but it just doesn't feel as good for some reason xD
are you crazy? one shots with deags in source is easy, in 1.6 you have to have some extreme luck and skill. and there's nothing like the blood spraying when your deagle bullet hits headshot.

1.6 one deags > source by a longshot.

though source aces > 1.6 aces by an even larger longshot lol. now that's epic to see.

[hxcguitarist]

the leaked version has a more 1.6 feel if I had to choose. I dont feel that there is a huge difference between the recoils, but source is definitely more random compared to 1.6...unless i have terrible luck. All the jumping headshots and running backward sprays gets a little old in source. Yes, it happens in 1.6, but I feel it happens much more often in source. The deagle is one example of the differences in recoil. Simply put, the source deagle is more accurate (thus easier to use) than the 1.6 deagle. However, I love getting those sexy 1 deags in source :).

The one deags in Source feel amazing! I'm not bashing on the one deags I've gotten in 1.6, but it just doesn't feel as good for some reason xD
are you crazy? one shots with deags in source is easy, in 1.6 you have to have some extreme luck and skill. and there's nothing like the blood spraying when your deagle bullet hits headshot.

1.6 one deags > source by a longshot.

though source aces > 1.6 aces by an even larger longshot lol. now that's epic to see.

You should read all the posts before you make yours ;D


I'm not denying that the one deags are easier, but they just feel sexier in Source man.

[shumped]

The one deags in Source feel amazing! I'm not bashing on the one deags I've gotten in 1.6, but it just doesn't feel as good for some reason xD
are you crazy? one shots with deags in source is easy, in 1.6 you have to have some extreme luck and skill.
and there's nothing like the blood spraying when your deagle bullet hits headshot.

1.6 one deags > source by a longshot.

though source aces > 1.6 aces by an even larger longshot lol. now that's epic to see.

You should read all the posts before you make yours ;D


I'm not denying that the one deags are easier, but they just feel sexier in Source man.
you should read my post before you try to point out my errors ;D

1.6 one deags > source one deags.

[hxcguitarist]

But I did read your post. O_O

[shumped]

But I did read your post. O_O
not good enough.

cause 1.6 one deags is always gonna be > source one deags.

[youtube:1c23axof]LOxrJklbI2I[/youtube:1c23axof][youtube:1c23axof]gfNs-R5M2EM[/youtube:1c23axof]

my vote goes for the 1.6 one actually, it feels more epic rather than with source where it's still epic but just not that epic LOL DID I JUST KILL PEEPS WITH ONE BULLET kinda feeling.

[hxcguitarist]

Not going to lie, but I like the 1.6 vid better, but when I'm playing the game, I enjoy source 1 deags just a bit more :P

[perfypoo]

the moral of this story is that the source deagle is easier than 1.6 deagle.

[Forever0]

Yes 1.6 is an older game with older technology that can probably be alter a lot more easier than directx.
1.6 has a ton more competitive cheaters than source. Why dont you think Ksharp and volcano probably dont want to even bother with 1.6 anymore? THEY GOT CHEATED IN A MATCH, the video of the kid is on noobflicks. His name was JMZ.

Pandemic Source actually practices too so dont say its because they want to play a game they dont have to practice.


Yes promod may be 1.6 Recoil woah big whop, the game FEELS like source so source players will be better at it from the beginning.

I already dont have to practice promod to be as good as I am in source. Woah omg recoil difference scared...

[lordxray]

Yes promod may be 1.6 Recoil woah big whop, the game FEELS like source so source players will be better at it from the beginning.

I already dont have to practice promod to be as good as I am in source. Woah omg recoil difference scared...

Dono man... when i´v first played 1.6 after a year or so on 1.5 i was way better than others. The same on CSS i´v played it like twice and a shoot about 10 kilometers behind a guy´s head and just droped dead. wierd though.

[tmaven]

But I did read your post. O_O
not good enough.
my vote goes for the 1.6 one actually, it feels more epic rather than with source where it's still epic but just not that epic LOL DID I JUST KILL PEEPS WITH ONE BULLET kinda feeling.


[youtube:72rgq2dz]3FNPmnkcwkM[/youtube:72rgq2dz]

[youtube:72rgq2dz]2xWfEoFSlFU[/youtube:72rgq2dz]

these actions > 1.6 deagles

[Mudrich]

Fyi to all the source players, this game is not going to have the terrible recoil of the dreaded source, they have made it clear the game is 1.6 with better graphics, only thing from source is the textures, skins, and sounds. not your bad recoil...

as a predominately source player, I'm okay with this.

[antyper]

But I did read your post. O_O
not good enough.
my vote goes for the 1.6 one actually, it feels more epic rather than with source where it's still epic but just not that epic LOL DID I JUST KILL PEEPS WITH ONE BULLET kinda feeling.


[youtube:2hdzo2n3]3FNPmnkcwkM[/youtube:2hdzo2n3]

[youtube:2hdzo2n3]2xWfEoFSlFU[/youtube:2hdzo2n3]

these actions > 1.6 deagles
almost all of these actions are haxed or faked(made with server command that slows game).

[russki]

But I did read your post. O_O
not good enough.
my vote goes for the 1.6 one actually, it feels more epic rather than with source where it's still epic but just not that epic LOL DID I JUST KILL PEEPS WITH ONE BULLET kinda feeling.


[youtube:2avus1in]3FNPmnkcwkM[/youtube:2avus1in]

[youtube:2avus1in]2xWfEoFSlFU[/youtube:2avus1in]
almost all of these actions are haxed or faked(made with server command that slows game).

Um... no. It's called Sony Vegas and Adobe Premiere. In the first clip you can clearly see it's normal speed. I've gotten 1deag aces before.. shit was epic. I love it when I shoot a kid in the face across the map and I see his brains splatter on the wall behind him and he slowly slides down that same wall after doing a backflip into it. Too bad it happens so damn rare. It's insanely hard to 1deag someone at a long distance in source.

[SirK]

deagle in source isnt that easy. i never play deagle in source cause i dont hit anybody but i just played 1.6 and found a deagle... would should i say but: i like the 1.6 deagle, its easier for me to shoot with xD

[phreaK]

the deagle in source is way overpowered. when i stand still and aim, nothing happens, but people can spam left and right on their keyboard and shoot as fast as they can and they get headshots. its bullshit. same with the rifles.

and those two youtube videos are cheated frags anyway.

[tmaven]

haxed? no.

just overedited.. easy to do 5 man with deagle if you can use your mouse...

[katzen]

haxed? no.

just overedited.. easy to do 5 man with deagle if you can use your mouse...

vent.exe my friend :roll:

[tmaven]

haxed? no.

just overedited.. easy to do 5 man with deagle if you can use your mouse...

vent.exe my friend :roll:

i see you never tested it..

[russki]

I actually already saw one kid cheating in the leaked version. It's amazing how fast they do this shit.

[phreaK]

haxed? no.

just overedited.. easy to do 5 man with deagle if you can use your mouse...

yeah

[lordxray]

I actually already saw one kid cheating in the leaked version. It's amazing how fast they do this shit.
you cant blame him for that dude... hes probably badly retarded!

[MaveN]

[youtube:3l2ouj00]3FNPmnkcwkM[/youtube:3l2ouj00][youtube:3l2ouj00]2xWfEoFSlFU[/youtube:3l2ouj00]
these actions > 1.6 deagles

video editing > 1.6 deagles

the following quote shows it clearly:


[youtube:3l2ouj00]LOxrJklbI2I[/youtube:3l2ouj00][youtube:3l2ouj00]gfNs-R5M2EM[/youtube:3l2ouj00]

the 1.6 video is in realtime and for source u need some slowmotion or IMPRESSIVE editing to make it look good

the source dgl frags looks so fuckin' unrealistic. like norecoil :O

[paradox]

the 1.6 video is in realtime and for source u need some slowmotion or IMPRESSIVE editing to make it look good

the source dgl frags looks so fuckin' unrealistic. like norecoil :O

If theres once thing source has that 1.6 doesn't it's definately realism ^^

[Chris]

Maven, what's with the cheater video :o

[MaveN]

If theres once thing source has that 1.6 doesn't it's definately realism ^^
look at that deagle O_O

@chris what do u mean?

[russki]

Dynamic Crosshair is disabled in the video, that's why it seems to you like there is no crosshair response. It really looks the as if it's the same amount of recoil as in the 1.6 video. I personally like the Source 1deags more, as do the majority of source players. 1.6 players like 1.6 1deags more.. who would've guessed. ._________________________.

[shumped]

the 1.6 video is in realtime and for source u need some slowmotion or IMPRESSIVE editing to make it look good

the source dgl frags looks so fuckin' unrealistic. like norecoil :O

If theres once thing source has that 1.6 doesn't it's definately realism ^^
this actually made me laugh irl.

[yogurt]

haxed? no.

just overedited.. easy to do 5 man with deagle if you can use your mouse...

vent.exe my friend :roll:

xime's video older than vent.exe my friend :roll:

l2shoot w/ dgl

[phreaK]

haxed? no.

just overedited.. easy to do 5 man with deagle if you can use your mouse...

vent.exe my friend :roll:

xime's video older than vent.exe my friend :roll:

l2shoot w/ dgl

no its not. and even if it was, its not like vent.exe is the only cheat out there.

[sevoii]

I actually already saw one kid cheating in the leaked version. It's amazing how fast they do this shit.
you cant blame him for that dude... hes probably badly retarded!

Erm, as far as I know, it wouldn't be too hard since it's running on the source engine, so uhm, source hacks work on source games?

[lordxray]

just look up on y2b cs deagle ace and you will see that there are only CSS frags actually... and that might reveal something to you... and no its not that css players are more skilled than 1.6 playas

[shumped]

just look up on y2b cs deagle ace and you will see that there are only CSS frags actually... and that might reveal something to you... and no its not that css players are more skilled than 1.6 playas
it's because editing in source is easy and there are many ways to do it and look good meanwhile on 1.6 editing just looks ugly all the time. therefore deagle aces for 1.6 is mostly just found on demos on forums while on source some dudes decides to take those demos and edit them and put them on youtube to get some fame.

and what's y2b? ytwob?

[smartin]

yes, youtoobe

[hsf]

But I did read your post. O_O
not good enough.
my vote goes for the 1.6 one actually, it feels more epic rather than with source where it's still epic but just not that epic LOL DID I JUST KILL PEEPS WITH ONE BULLET kinda feeling.


[youtube:2jlyhsc9]3FNPmnkcwkM[/youtube:2jlyhsc9]

[youtube:2jlyhsc9]2xWfEoFSlFU[/youtube:2jlyhsc9]

these actions > 1.6 deagles


First video is made by xIME, who is a known cheater, along with kRYSTAL, sLINK and all the other shitters in the video. They've all been caught numerous times etc etc, so "those actions < 1.6 deagles"

Also, the second video is compiled of many cheat frags, although some of them are legitimate, the majority are cheated. Again, xIME, kRYSTAL, sLINK, Clayman, etc... All German cheaters.


Dynamic Crosshair is disabled in the video, that's why it seems to you like there is no crosshair response. It really looks the as if it's the same amount of recoil as in the 1.6 video. I personally like the Source 1deags more, as do the majority of source players. 1.6 players like 1.6 1deags more.. who would've guessed. ._________________________.


The thing is with deagle kill, in source, they're a more frequent occurrence because, it's easier to kill with the deagle. So you're not as impressed when you see them, but in 1.6, you rarely see 5man deagle 1shots, purely because in 1.6 the deagle recoil is hilariously bad, after the 2nd or 3rd bullet, the recoil is completely fucked and you start shooting bird out of the sky when looking at the floor. This makes deagle kills more impressive, and I personally enjoy watching deagle kills from 1.6, I've seen and done deagle 5mans enough times in source to know, that it's not difficult.

[russki]

But I did read your post. O_O
not good enough.
my vote goes for the 1.6 one actually, it feels more epic rather than with source where it's still epic but just not that epic LOL DID I JUST KILL PEEPS WITH ONE BULLET kinda feeling.


[youtube:1z7kkznb]3FNPmnkcwkM[/youtube:1z7kkznb]

[youtube:1z7kkznb]2xWfEoFSlFU[/youtube:1z7kkznb]

these actions > 1.6 deagles


First video is made by xIME, who is a known cheater, along with kRYSTAL, sLINK and all the other shitters in the video. They've all been caught numerous times etc etc, so "those actions < 1.6 deagles"

Also, the second video is compiled of many cheat frags, although some of them are legitimate, the majority are cheated. Again, xIME, kRYSTAL, sLINK, Clayman, etc... All German cheaters.


Dynamic Crosshair is disabled in the video, that's why it seems to you like there is no crosshair response. It really looks the as if it's the same amount of recoil as in the 1.6 video. I personally like the Source 1deags more, as do the majority of source players. 1.6 players like 1.6 1deags more.. who would've guessed. ._________________________.


The thing is with deagle kill, in source, they're a more frequent occurrence because, it's easier to kill with the deagle. So you're not as impressed when you see them, but in 1.6, you rarely see 5man deagle 1shots, purely because in 1.6 the deagle recoil is hilariously bad, after the 2nd or 3rd bullet, the recoil is completely fucked and you start shooting bird out of the sky when looking at the floor. This makes deagle kills more impressive, and I personally enjoy watching deagle kills from 1.6, I've seen and done deagle 5mans enough times in source to know, that it's not difficult.

Go into a server, stand still, fire the deagle, and you'll notice something... OH NO, IT'S NOT ACCURATE WHAT SO EVER. I refuse to acknowledge that the deagle is any less random in source than it is in 1.6, because when I get 3 1deags in a row, or when I get a 1deag from cat down into ct mid on dust2, that's fucking impressive regardless of what game you're playing. The only reason I THINK that the 1deags are a more frequent occurence is because source is a more close quarters game, so the deagle is simply used more often. idk, I may just be freakin out.

[PolarPanda]

The 1.6 frags were just more impressive is all. He got rushed by 3 people at once and had to place his shots. Most of the source frags were just people running into his crosshairs one after another, which makes things easy for anyone.

+edit
And with the ginormous heads in source, it's no wonder many players find 1shots easier on it.

[[EA]]

lol